tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7415178.post190521238664216971..comments2023-10-23T00:04:35.356-04:00Comments on The Vault of Buncheness: AMBER ASKS A GOOD QUESTIONBunche (pop culture ronin)http://www.blogger.com/profile/11831085937894725459noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7415178.post-84973272183598217352009-08-17T12:26:46.207-04:002009-08-17T12:26:46.207-04:00Nylon, leather, rubber, vinyl, pvc, lycra - skin-t...Nylon, leather, rubber, vinyl, pvc, lycra - skin-tight is a delight.<br /><br />Don't take it off until we're done.Michael Kraigerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00535870279291119416noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7415178.post-64756881986829994542009-08-17T00:08:25.523-04:002009-08-17T00:08:25.523-04:00I’d say nearly all my past boyfriends would’ve pic...I’d say nearly all my past boyfriends would’ve picked the “scantily clad” option, though a couple preferred to see me in tight outfits revealing just a bit.<br /><br />Still, I think there’s something really alluring about a barrier, however minor. And as Deacon Blue suggests, the fabric makes a big difference to the answer – leather, velvet, silk, satin, lace… each has its own appeal. Fishnet stockings and sheer body-stockings are sexy precisely because they make the legs (or the entire body) appear both naked and “dressed” at the same time. From the comments above it looks like people find “scantily clad” sexier. Most of the time I’d also feel sexier when “scantily clad.” (Building on Amber’s query, I’m curious whether other women would say the same.) Yet there’s a certain powerful sexuality inherent in being tightly wrapped… in looking both available and unreachable at once. It's both a secret and a dare.<br /><br />So - for me - it seems "scantily clad" wins by a very narrow margin.fireflynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7415178.post-81561231132498546352009-08-15T20:58:09.886-04:002009-08-15T20:58:09.886-04:00Two words:
Dejah ThorisTwo words:<br />Dejah Thorisczeloushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08337939928357740583noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7415178.post-6252167069522860762009-08-15T17:00:43.007-04:002009-08-15T17:00:43.007-04:00When it comes to the arousal phase...the seduction...When it comes to the arousal phase...the seduction, the making out, the leading up to the grand event, I'd take tightly covered up over nearly naked.<br /><br />The "second skin" motif is very powerful for me, and the idea that you cannot see the skin, but it's so close...and depending on the outfit perhaps covered in something very visually interesting (shiny, smooth, with accoutrements, etc.) and possibly carrying its own scent as well as hers (leater and latex, for example) and having tactile novelties (silk, satin, leather, latex, nylon, etc. all having their distinctions)...well, that really adds a lot, even though it "hides" stuff.<br /><br />However, once it comes to the actual glorious sexual encounter, having all or most of those clothes come off is far sexier to me. Once it comes time to truly explore the terrain, I don't want much of anything in the way, except perhaps for gloves and/or shoes/boots in the right context. I mean, obviously, one can often have sex with a woman in skintight garb, since there is usually an access point or a pull-away panel somewhere...but it just wouldn't be the same to me.<br /><br />So, covered up and nearly naked are pretty much equal in my book. It's just the arousal vs. fulfillment part that makes one or the other take precendence.Deacon Bluehttp://holyhell.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7415178.post-79559660459287526082009-08-15T12:28:00.867-04:002009-08-15T12:28:00.867-04:00Butt Nekid!!!
P.S. Welcome backButt Nekid!!!<br /><br />P.S. Welcome backCool Sweater Guyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11285676848112713500noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7415178.post-19345488489444613432009-08-15T10:09:44.446-04:002009-08-15T10:09:44.446-04:00Nearly naked. Definitly.Nearly naked. Definitly.Satyrbladehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18015786983800102480noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7415178.post-10220562371508625552009-08-15T08:46:14.357-04:002009-08-15T08:46:14.357-04:00I like skin. Lots and lots of skin. Especially p...I like skin. Lots and lots of skin. Especially pale skin with freckles. Oh, and red hair. And blue eyes. About 5'6". And Jane Krakowski's chin. Glasses a plus.<br /><br />But I haven't really thought on it much... :)Kevin M. Hagermannoreply@blogger.com