I'm a lifelong STAR TREK kid, so I firmly believe in the principle of IDIC (Infinite Diversity in Infinite Combinations) and the wonder of seeking out new life and new civilizations, and the Thing and its cornucopia of forms is itself the very embodiment of IDIC. Imagine what could have been if Earthmen and the Thing had met in friendship and fostered an understanding? Even as a child when I played with my Major Matt Mason astronauts and my beloved Outer Space Men aliens (Google them; I would gladly commit a felony to have all of them again), the interactions of my characters were influenced by Trek’s sense of the wonder of exploration and inter-species unity, so my aliens were never evil invaders. Despite their sometimes bizarre appearances or bodies built for strength and carnage, they were all fellow explorers who extended hands/tentacles/wings in friendship, so approaching THE THING with that mindset, I weep for that misunderstood intelligent sentient. I totally understand why the Earthmen dealt with it in the way that they did, and that THE THING is at heart a monster movie that examines abject paranoia, but still...
What do you think? Please write in with your thoughts on this.
1 comment:
Hi. This short story - "The Things" by Peter Watts - tells the story from The Thing's POV. It is a very powerful answer to the debate about this film. https://clarkesworldmagazine.com/watts_01_10/
Post a Comment