Search This Blog

Wednesday, January 23, 2008


Thanks to John Gibson for alerting me to this one. The question I have is will this study actually lead to any sort of consequences for their actions:

By DOUGLASS K. DANIEL, Associated Press Writer Wed Jan 23, 6:43 AM ET

WASHINGTON - A study by two nonprofit journalism organizations found that President Bush and top administration officials issued hundreds of false statements about the national security threat from Iraq in the two years following the 2001 terrorist attacks.

The study concluded that the statements "were part of an orchestrated campaign that effectively galvanized public opinion and, in the process, led the nation to war under decidedly false pretenses."

The study was posted Tuesday on the Web site of the Center for Public Integrity, which worked with the Fund for Independence in Journalism.

White House spokesman Scott Stanzel did not comment on the merits of the study Tuesday night but reiterated the administration's position that the world community viewed Iraq's leader, Saddam Hussein, as a threat.

"The actions taken in 2003 were based on the collective judgment of intelligence agencies around the world," Stanzel said.

The study counted 935 false statements in the two-year period. It found that in speeches, briefings, interviews and other venues, Bush and administration officials stated unequivocally on at least 532 occasions that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction or was trying to produce or obtain them or had links to al-Qaida or both.

"It is now beyond dispute that Iraq did not possess any weapons of mass destruction or have meaningful ties to al-Qaida," according to Charles Lewis and Mark Reading-Smith of the Fund for Independence in Journalism staff members, writing an overview of the study. "In short, the Bush administration led the nation to war on the basis of erroneous information that it methodically propagated and that culminated in military action against Iraq on March 19, 2003."

Named in the study along with Bush were top officials of the administration during the period studied: Vice President Dick Cheney, national security adviser Condoleezza Rice, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary of State Colin Powell, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz and White House press secretaries Ari Fleischer and Scott McClellan.

Bush led with 259 false statements, 231 about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and 28 about Iraq's links to al-Qaida, the study found. That was second only to Powell's 244 false statements about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and 10 about Iraq and al-Qaida.

The center said the study was based on a database created with public statements over the two years beginning on Sept. 11, 2001, and information from more than 25 government reports, books, articles, speeches and interviews.

"The cumulative effect of these false statements — amplified by thousands of news stories and broadcasts — was massive, with the media coverage creating an almost impenetrable din for several critical months in the run-up to war," the study concluded.

"Some journalists — indeed, even some entire news organizations — have since acknowledged that their coverage during those prewar months was far too deferential and uncritical. These mea culpas notwithstanding, much of the wall-to-wall media coverage provided additional, 'independent' validation of the Bush administration's false statements about Iraq," it said.


Anonymous said...

Of course there won't be. The Democrats have proved that they have no interest in meaningful action against King George, the Republican Party has proved that it will refuse to take meaninful action against King George, and the American media has proved that it cannot take any meaningful action that would detract from its coverage of missing white girls, Paris Hilton, Britney Spears, or evil Muslims.


Anonymous said...

It shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone who isn't a Bush Brownshirt (thats what I like to call Bush supporters).
This piece of shit has been a liar and a phony since Day One.
Is it January '09 yet?

Chez said...

By this point, the people who put together this study may as well be regarded the same way a couple of patronizing parents regard the art work of a retarded son or daughter.

"Oh, look at that -- President Bush lied. You went through all that trouble. Well isn't that nice. See honey -- look what little Timmy did. Let's just put that on the refrigerator."

Just a complete waste of time unfortuantely.

Anonymous said...

and they tried to impeach clinton for a blowjob. seperation of church and state my ass. man, I hope bush gets impeached, it's not too late. his entire adminstration is a political manipulation, an affront to american democracy, and a series of lies. he's broken the economy, and is doing his best to nullify any (even if they were modest)advancements we've made environmentally. this morning the ticker in times square had some thing about bush trying to burnish his legacy. impeached on his last year, even on the last day of his regime would bring at least some small sense of justice to an increasingly angry, outraged. and betrayed constituency, no matter his status as the puppet of the ultra wealthy. I figured some one else needed to say it. in one more public forum. sorry if it's getting repetitive.